ONLINE FIRST
published on March 16, 2022
Martin Svantner
https://doi.org/10.5840/ajs202231579
Agency as Semiotic Fabrication
A Comparative Study of Latour¡¯s ANT
This text shows that Latour¡¯s methodological displacement of the theory of sign into the realm of the general semiological narrative itself truncates his own theory of sign from its essential part, which is a tradition derived from the work of C. S. Peirce. This reduction of the general theory of sign is not just a matter of the given theoretical and methodological jargon or arbitrarily chosen expressions; it also has binding ontological suppositions and consequences. A debate on the semiotic-ontological aspects of actor-network theory (ANT) can be conducted beyond Latour¡¯s general division into ¡°the semiotics of discourse¡± and the ¡°semiotics of things/material semiotics¡±, where the ¡°semiotics of things¡± should be counter-positional, or at least complementary to, the discourse-centric concept of agency. This perspective (simply put: discourse vs. things) can be viewed in the context of the discussion of the realist and nominalist nature of a sign as a specific relation, which begs the question: By sign do we mean a phenomenon that is constructed solely by the power of the human mind, or do we mean an ontologically unique relation not reducible to human language?