Volume 15, Issue 1, 2024
G. I. Gurdjieff and the Work Tradition
David Seamon

Pages 26-51
https://doi.org/10.5840/asrr2024131107
Holism and the Gurdjieff Work
Henri Bortoft¡¯s Authentic Wholeness and J. G. Bennett¡¯s Systematics
This article discusses two complementary approaches to wholeness at least partly indebted to the system of self-transformation developed by spiritual teacher G. I. Gurdjieff: first, British philosopher of science Henri Bortoft¡¯s discussion of authentic wholeness; and second, British philosopher J. G. Bennett¡¯s systematics, a method for describing phenomena via the qualitative significance of numbers. The article begins with a review of the significance of wholeness in recent Western thinking, including Western esotericism. The article then highlights Bortoft and Bennett¡¯s approaches to wholeness and considers how their efforts relate to a Gurdjieffian point of view. The argument is made that Bortoft¡¯s discussion of understanding sets the stage for the manner of encountering and knowing presupposed by Bennett¡¯s systematics. The author then draws on Bennett¡¯s systematics interpretation of two-ness (the dyad) and four-ness (the tetrad) to illustrate how a systematics perspective clarifies the wholeness of the Gurdjieff Work as it is a comprehensive system of psychological and spiritual transformation.