ONLINE FIRST
published on January 4, 2024
Andrea Comiskey
https://doi.org/10.5840/filmphil2023122027
Stop-Motion Animation¡¯s Object Substitutions and Non-Depictive Representation
This article explores a distinctive representational strategy used in stop-motion animation: the object substitution. Using as its central example a children¡¯s TV episode in which brushes stand in for dogs, it explains how this strategy produces a complex relationship between depiction and representation. The analysis highlights the pragmatic underpinnings of various theories of pictorial and cinematic representation, arguing that, in a substitution, depicted elements constitute explicatures and represented ones implicatures. Connecting this strategy to humans¡¯ capacity for pareidolia (seeing things in other things), it contends that an object substitution achieves its effects¡ªand reconciles its marked incongruities¡ªby prompting viewers to pleasurably reverse-engineer the far-fetched projective imagining that motivated its use. This process, which is a form of conceptual blending, is based on relations that are neither straightforwardly iconic nor purely arbitrary.