Volume 45, Issue 3, September 2022
Jeff Mitchell
Pages 327-333
https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil20211216156
On the Invidious Distinction Between Weak and Strong Critical Thinking
The distinction between weak and strong forms of critical thinking is a hallmark of Richard Paul¡¯s pedagogy. He maintains that good reasoning entails a personal commitment to fair-mindedness. In this brief essay, I argue that Paul¡¯s conception of fair-mindedness conflates cognitive empathy with empathetic concern and altruism. One¡¯s understanding another¡¯s perspective by no means entails approving of it, and one may seek to better grasp this standpoint for purely selfish reasons. Depending upon the circumstances, the other could be one¡¯s competitor, enemy, mark, or even intended victim. This implies that while we may wish that the world were otherwise, even very bad people can be highly effective critical thinkers.