Volume 11, Issue 3, September 2022
Patrick Denning
Pages 122-133
https://doi.org/10.5840/tht202341718
Faultless Disagreement as Evidence for Moral Relativism
Arguments from faultless disagreement appeal to the possibility of mistake-free disagreement as evidence for semantic relativism. Typically, these arguments focus on paradigmatically subjective topics such as taste, aesthetics, and comedy. Many philosophers hold that ethics is also a subjective topic. But so far, there has been little discussion of faultless disagreement in ethics. In this paper, I advance an argument from faultless moral disagreement, in favour of a relativist semantics for ethics.