ONLINE FIRST
published on September 9, 2022
Julio de Rizzo

https://doi.org/10.5840/tht2022924
No Choice for Incompatibilism
P. van Inwagen famously offered three precise versions of the so-called Consequence Argument for incompatibilism. The third of these essentially employs the notion of an agent¡¯s having a choice with respect to a proposition. In this paper, I offer two intuitively attractive accounts of this notion in terms of the explanatory connective ¡®because¡¯ and explore the prospects of the third argument once they are in play. Under either account, the argument fails.