ONLINE FIRST
published on February 17, 2024
Ian George Robertson
https://doi.org/10.5840/tht202421525
In Defence of Radically Enactive Imagination
Hutto and Myin defend, on the basis of their ¡°radically enactive¡± approach to cognition, the contention that there are certain forms of imaginative activity that are entirely devoid of representational content. In a recent Thought article, Roelofs argues that Hutto and Myin¡¯s arguments fail to recognise the role of representation in maintaining the structural isomorphisms between mental models and things in the world required for imagination be action-guiding. This reply to Roelofs argues that his objection fails because it fails to fully appreciate the resources radical enactivists have at their disposal in characterising basic imaginings.