ONLINE FIRST
published on September 24, 2025
Camilo Martinez
https://doi.org/10.5840/tht202591850
No Guarantee
Coherence, Rationality, and Fragmentation
According to Anti-structuralists about rationality, such as Errol Lord and Benjamin Kiesewetter, incoherence is irrational because it guarantees a failure to respond to one¡¯s possessed reasons. For example, since having sufficient evidence for believing p entails not having sufficient evidence for not¨Cp, it must be unreasonable to hold both beliefs. I argue that one of the most compelling explanations of how incoherence is psychologically possible, the fragmentation hypothesis, undermines this account of why it is irrational. When one¡¯s beliefs are fragmented, there is no guarantee that being reasonable is sufficient for being coherent.