ONLINE FIRST
published on July 24, 2025
Michael Lamb

https://doi.org/10.5840/augstudies202572394
The Politics of Usufruct
Augustine on Using and Enjoying the Commonwealth and Creation
One of Augustine¡¯s most controversial ideas is his ¡°order of love,¡± which he explicates using a distinction between ¡°use¡± (usus) and ¡°enjoyment¡± (fruitio). Critics complain that, by encouraging us to ¡°use¡± each other and the world to ¡°enjoy¡± God, Augustine instrumentalizes human beings and temporal goods in ways that deny their intrinsic value. In recent years, influential scholars have challenged this critique by offering alternative accounts of Augustine¡¯s order of love and his distinction between use and enjoyment. Often overlooked is an essential aspect of this distinction, namely, its Roman legal context, where rights of ¡°usufruct¡± and ¡°use¡± not only authorize others to ¡°use¡± property owned by others but also prescribe duties of stewardship and sustainability that govern such use. In what follows, I explain the Roman laws of usufruct and use and show how Augustine, as a bishop managing church property and adjudicating cases on the episcopal court, would have likely been familiar with such laws. I then show how recovering these Roman legal concepts supports alternative accounts of Augustine¡¯s order of love. In particular, when properly situated in their Roman legal and linguistic contexts, these concepts furnish a new interpretation of Augustine¡¯s ethics of ¡°use¡± and cast new light on what it means to ¡°use¡± and ¡°enjoy¡± the commonwealth and creation. In addition to offering a new interpretative lens, I show how elevating the concept of usufruct can supply constructive resources for contemporary accounts of political and ecological ethics.